Sunday, September 11, 2005

the Transporter and Transporter 2.

Goddamm i love Luc Besson. This guy rules. So why does transporter 2 suck so bad? and transporter 1 rule? Well i think its because they tried too hard on 2. One was an action movie that didn't need a sequel. How many Besson movies have a sequel? The taxi series... ever seen any of them? me either cuz they were never released in the states... but you dont see nikita 2. There is a reason for that. Transporter one fucking rules. one of the best opening sequences this side of james bond movies, and pretty sweet fight scenes too.

This is what i miss in Transporter 2. Sweet car? a shitty blinged out audi? bleech. that's not the super-pimp black bmw from the first one. i dont buy it frank wouldn't drive that shitty thing. the Lamberghini at the end dope! but the SFX with the plane at the end suck balls. and whats up with the bad guy fighting in a kendo costume at the begining but not fighting kendo style? and why does he hardly put up any fight at the end? with all his sweet fighting? i dunno. my next complaint is that all the "hot chicks" in this movie look like paris hilton clones. Tall skinny with a tight little ass and small tits. they were fit dont get me wrong but how about a little variety? Too many skinny chicks, ugly blingy car, and sketchy SFX at the end not great a carchases and an lack luster opening all made me very disapointed in Transporter 2. But the good news is, similar to the matrix movies, the sequel makes you appriciate the original.

transporter:

Four out of Five tacobell sauce packets

Transporter 2:

two out of five tacobell sauce packets.

No comments: